Review this documentation

Help review the documentation in bisq-network/documentation. Article wording is preserved from the wiki unless an article names an accepted edit; proposed edits are reviewed separately. An accepted edit is named on the article itself, with a link to its pull request.

What to review

Read an article alongside the current application and official sources. Please identify outdated instructions, missing warnings, incorrect product boundaries, unclear steps, and images that no longer match the interface. Use particular care with payment, wallet recovery and dispute instructions.

A separate AI-edited edition and a comparison index are preserved in the repository under review/. The 98 edited guides are review material; they are not the main documentation or part of site search. The index helps reviewers compare them with their recovered sources. Scripted checks compare preserved article sources and their rendered counterparts; they do not establish that the historical instructions remain correct today.

Report a correction with the page link, product and version, suggested change, and a supporting source or reproducible observation. Do not include wallet seeds, private keys, payment details, or private trade conversations in public issues.

Sources and saved links

Each original article has preserved source text and available revision metadata. All recovered wiki title paths and 98 earlier edited-guide paths remain available as compatibility links. Where an edited guide combined multiple articles, its compatibility page offers the relevant originals for selection.

The recovery status describes the snapshot, recovered images, missing files, attribution and reuse questions. Old images and role information may no longer reflect current software or availability.